School supervision on teaching and learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31571/eijournal.v1i2.7Keywords:
Monitoring Progress, Implementation of monitoring progress, differences in progress monitoring activitiesAbstract
The purpose of this study is expected to provide an overview of the implementation of progress monitoring and its differences. The subjects of this study were 8 schools in West Kalimantan, spread across 6 districts. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach. In collecting data, researchers used observation and interview methods. Data analysis using Thematic Analysis and Cross-case Analysis. The results showed that there were IHT activities and annual meetings in developing teacher professionalism, the school system supported learning activities, discussions in the teacher's room, namely MGMP and KOMBEL, teachers were actively involved in evaluating school policies. The difference between the 8 schools included in the SMP and SMA levels is that there are schools that do not carry out IHT, Annual Deliberations, MGMP and KOMBEL.Downloads
Published
2023-08-10
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ghina Karmila, Vera Talimbung, Sahrawi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.